Comment
The new decision is remarkable because it is already difficult to establish the existence of a trademark acquired by use with originally protectable signs. It is all the more extraordinary that Lindt has succeeded with an originally non-protectable sign. Thus, it can be concluded that with similarly high allocation rates as Lindt was able to prove, it is quite possible to be granted trademarks acquired by use that originally were not protectable.
Latest posts
-
Sequence listings filed with divisional applications: new EPO practice
13. November 2023
-
Communication with the EPO via email
23. November 2022
-
Prior publication of a Community Design within the 12-month grace period by the bulletin of an Office is an act of harmless disclosure under Art. 7(2) CDR
31. August 2022